Marker Guide

Oxalate degrading microbes

What this marker measures

The collective capacity of the gut microbial community to degrade oxalate, a compound found in many plant foods and also produced by the body. By degrading oxalate in the intestine, gut microbes may reduce oxalate absorption into the bloodstream and and excretion of oxalate into the urine1,2. Low oxalate-degrading potential may be relevant to calcium oxalate kidney stone risk in susceptible individuals1–5.

Download the PDF

Clinical associations

Consider this marker when your patient presents with:

Kidney stones
Recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones, hyperoxaluria, or a history of calcium oxalate stones

Interpreting the result

All results are compared to Microba's healthy cohort to determine whether they fall within or outside the expected range.

LOW
Oxalate-degrading potential is lower than expected
This may indicate reduced microbial capacity to degrade intestinal oxalate. Interpret alongside stone history, dietary oxalate intake, and calcium intake with meals. Action: see patient management insights below.
Within Range
Oxalate degrading potential is within expected parameters
This suggests microbial oxalate-degrading capacity is not reduced.
HIGH
Oxalate-degrading potential is higher than expected
Usually reassuring in isolation and may suggest greater microbial capacity to degrade intestinal oxalate.

Patient management insights

Support healthy oxalate handling and reduce urinary oxalate exposure in patients with recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones.

Dietary strategies
Sufficient calcium intake may help reduce urinary oxalate excretion 2,6–8D
Clinical considerations
This marker is most relevant for patients with recurrent kidney stones.

Calcium should be consumed with oxalate-rich meals for maximum benefit.

Tips for patients discussion

Your report suggests lower gut microbial capacity to break down oxalate — a compound found in many plant foods that can contribute kidney stones in susceptible people. One simple way to help is to include calcium-rich foods with your meals — calcium binds to oxalate in the gut, helping to stop it from being absorbed.

The community

No single species produces butyrate alone — here are some of the most common, however this list is not exhaustive

  • 51_20 sp001917175
  • Escherichia flexneri
  • Ruminococcaceae MIC7581
  • Bifidobacterium animalis
  • Lactobacillus acidophilus
  • Streptococcus mutans
  • Bifidobacterium dentium
  • Lactobacillus gasseri_A
  • UBA7173 MIC7159
  • Bifidobacterium MIC6680
  • Muribaculum sp002492595
  • UBA7173 MIC7508
  • Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum
  • Oxalobacter formigenes_A
  • UBA7173 MIC7596
  • CAG-1031 sp000431215
  • Oxalobacter MIC6654
  • Escherichia coli
  • Paramuribaculum MIC6915
  • Escherichia dysenteriae
  • Paramuribaculum sp000431155

How results are calculated

All microbiome marker results are compared against the Microba Healthy Cohort — a purpose-built group of more than 450 healthy individuals, with samples collected and analysed using the same workflow as patient samples

.Each marker is scored by comparing the patient's relative abundance against the cohort average. The distance from this average is expressed as standard deviations, and determines whether a result is classified as Low, Borderline, or High.

How the result scale works
▲ AVG (Healthy Cohort average)
The patient's relative abundance is compared to the Healthy Cohort average. A negative distance from average means the microbial group is less abundant than the Healthy Cohort. A positive distance means it is more abundant. Results falling outside the expected range are classified as borderline or high/low  (borderline high/low:+/-0.68,andhigh/low:+/-1.28).
Evidence grading for patient management insights
The letter grades shown next to each patient management insight show the quality of the research behind it. Every insight provided has been through a rigorous review of the scientific literature and graded using the NHMRC Levels of Evidence, so you can see exactly how strong the evidence is before applying it in practice.

Source references for all clinical associations, interpretation definitions, and patient management insights on this card.

1. Siener, R. et al. The role of Oxalobacter formigenes colonization in calcium oxalate stone disease. Kidney International 83, 1144–1149 (2013).
2. Jiang, J. et al. Impact of dietary calcium and oxalate, and Oxalobacter formigenes colonization on urinary oxalate excretion. J Urol 186, 135–139 (2011).
3. Ticinesi, A. et al. Understanding the gut–kidney axis in nephrolithiasis: an analysis of the gut microbiota composition and functionality of stone formers. Gut 67, 2097–2106 (2018).
4. Tavasoli, S. et al. Association of intestinal oxalate-degrading bacteria with recurrent calcium kidney stone formation and hyperoxaluria: a case-control study. BJU Int 125, 133–143 (2020).
5. Troxel, S. A., Sidhu, H., Kaul, P. & Low, R. K. Intestinal Oxalobacter formigenes Colonization in Calcium Oxalate Stone Formers and Its Relation to Urinary Oxalate. Journal of Endourology 17, 173–176 (2003).
6. Nouvenne, A. et al. Diet to reduce mild hyperoxaluria in patients with idiopathic calcium oxalate stone formation: a pilot study. Urology 73, 725–730, 730.e1 (2009).
7. von Unruh, G. E., Voss, S., Sauerbruch, T. & Hesse, A. Dependence of oxalate absorption on the daily calcium intake. J Am Soc Nephrol 15, 1567–1573 (2004).
8. Borghi, L. et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 346, 77–84 (2002).